Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[DOWNLOAD] "Matter Louis I. Garisto v. James H. Tully" by Supreme Court of New York ~ eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Matter Louis I. Garisto v. James H. Tully

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Matter Louis I. Garisto v. James H. Tully
  • Author : Supreme Court of New York
  • Release Date : January 30, 1982
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 62 KB

Description

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Tax Commission which sustained an unincorporated business tax assessment imposed pursuant to article 23 of the Tax Law. During the years at issue, 1968-1970, petitioner, a well-respected musician, received his income as a composer, scorer and orchestrator of music produced to accompany television films, some of which were commercial messages. In fact, it is uncontroverted that during this period, approximately 70% of petitioners income was derived from his work on television commercials. In 1976, petitioner and his wife received a notice of deficiency for unpaid unincorporated business taxes for the years 1968-1970. Petitioner denied he owed any unincorporated business tax, claiming that all his activities constituted the practice of a profession and, accordingly, were exempt from the unincorporated business tax (Tax Law, § 703, subd [c]). After a hearing, the State Tax Commission (commission) determined that the activities of petitioner with respect to creating music for commercial messages concerned the conduct of business itself and, therefore, did not constitute professional activities exempt from unincorporated business tax. The 30% balance of petitioners income was found not to be subject to unincorporated business tax. Further, the commission canceled the notice of deficiency asserted against petitioners wife. The sole question presented in this proceeding is whether or not the income petitioner derived from his work on television commercials is exempt under subdivision (c) of section 703 of the Tax Law as income derived from the practice of a profession. Upon the instant record we are unable to find arbitrary or capricious the commissions determination that petitioners activities, insofar as they related to the creation of music for commercial messages, constituted the carrying on of a taxable unincorporated business rather than the nontaxable practice of a profession within the meaning of subdivision (c) of section 703 of the Tax Law (see Matter of Koner v Procaccino, 39 N.Y.2d 258, 263-265; [91 A.D.2d 811 Page 812]


PDF Books Download "Matter Louis I. Garisto v. James H. Tully" Online ePub Kindle